Exploring the impact of light intensity under speed breeding conditions on the development and growth of lentil and chickpea

The use of high-performant varieties could help to improve the production of food legumes and thus meet the demand of the growing world population. However, long periods needed to develop new varieties through traditional breeding are a major obstacle. Thus, new techniques allowing faster genetic advance are needed. Speed breeding using longer periods of light exposure on plants, appears to be a good solution for accelerating plant life cycles and generation turnover. However, applying extended photoperiod causes plant stress and mortality due to lack of information on the adequate intensity to be used in speed breeding protocol. This study examines the impact of light intensity under speed breeding conditions on the development and growth of lentils and chickpeas, with a keen interest in enhancing genetic gain in these key food legumes. Four distinct levels of light intensity (T1: Green-house: 2000 µmol/m2/s; T2: 148–167 µmol/m2/s; T3: 111–129 µmol/m2/s; T4: 74–93 µmol/m2/s) under a photoperiod of 18 h of light and 6 h of darkness were tested in a growth chamber. Significant variation depending on light intensity was observed for plant height, total biomass, number of secondary stems, pods number, number of seeds per plant, growth rate, green canopy cover, time to flowering, time of pod set, time to maturity, vegetative stage length, reproduction stage length and seed filling stage length. Light intensity significantly influenced flowering/maturity and plant’s stress compared to normal conditions in green-house where flowering/maturity were around 67/97 days for lentil and 79/111 days for chickpea. Therefore, lentils in treatment 2 flowered and reached maturity in 30/45 days respectively, with high stress, while chickpeas in the same treatment did not flower. In contrast, treatment 4 showed interesting results, promoting optimal growth with low stress, and flowering/maturity in 27/46 days and 28/54 days, respectively for lentils and chickpeas. These results underline the crucial importance of light management in speed breeding to accelerate vegetative growth and phenology while allowing healthy growth conditions for plants to produce enough seeds for generation turnover.


Introduction
Light quality, light intensity and photoperiod duration are key regulatory factors for healthy plant growth and development in controlled environments using artificial light sources, particularly light-emitting diode lamps (LEDs).Optimum light quality, in particular the ratio of red and far-red (R:FR) to blue lights, has been extensively studied for many plant species, including radishes [1], grapes [2], lettuce [3] and lentil [4] to establish lighting conditions conducive to plant growth.
Light intensity, refers to the rate at which light spreads over a given surface area.It is also referred to as the energy transferred per unit area [5,6].Furthermore, the intensity of light plays a fundamental and indispensable role in the growth and development of plants.As a primary source of energy for photosynthesis [4], light provides the necessary foundation for the production of organic molecules and the development and growth of plant tissues.The importance of light intensity lies in its direct influence on the speed and efficiency of photosynthesis, the key process by which plants convert light into chemical energy [6].Adequate light intensity ensures a sufficient supply of energy to fuel the biochemical reactions of photosynthesis, promoting the production of sugars, starch, and other metabolic compounds necessary for plant growth and development [5].Furthermore, light intensity influences plant morphology by regulating leaf size, stem branching, root formation, and other aspects of plant architecture.Optimal light intensity allows for a balanced allocation of resources and fosters the harmonious growth of all parts of the plant.In addition to photoperiod duration, the light intensity can also influence flowering time, which decreases with increasing light intensity [7,8].However, excessive light intensity can also be detrimental.High levels of light can cause energy overload, leading to oxidative damage and deterioration of cellular components, and, when the intensity of light continues to rise, chlorophyll becomes vulnerable to damage, leading to a subsequent decrease in the rate of photosynthesis [6].
Plants have developed photoprotection mechanisms to protect against the damaging effects of light excess, notably in Photosystem II (PSII) [9].When light is abundant, PSII can become overloaded, leading to oxidative damage to the vital components of this photosynthetic system.To avoid this, plants implement various photoprotection strategies to minimize damage caused by light excess [10].One of these protective mechanisms is nonphotochemical energy dissipation [9,11].Plants can convert the excess energy into heat rather than potentially damaging chemical reactions.Moreover, plants can also regulate the number and concentration of photosynthetic pigments present in their cells, increasing or decreasing their concentration depending on the light intensity.This adaptation enables more efficient use of light and protection against oxidative damage and it is demonstrated that metabolic responses to severe water stress and intense light occur indirectly as a result of oxidative stress, rather than being a direct response to water scarcity [12].Additionally, some plants may exhibit shading mechanisms, where leaves or plant structures overlap to reduce direct exposure to intense light, but excessive shading can induce leaf senescence in plants exposed to low light intensities [13].These plant adaptation mechanisms to varying light intensity demonstrate their dynamic responsiveness to environmental conditions.
Light intensity has a significant influence on metabolism and plant morphology, including leaf size, stem growth, plant height, and root development [14,15].When subjected to high light intensity, plants tend to develop smaller and thicker leaves.Therefore, using an optimum level of light intensity, quality and duration, and maintaining a low level of plant stress, can be beneficial.This can contribute to better plant health and reduced mortality of plants under speed breeding conditions, promoting greater stability and productivity across generations [16,17].
To our knowledge, there are no published studies on the impact of photoperiod and light intensity during the vegetative and reproductive stages of lentil and chickpea on their growth and development.The main objective of our study is to thoroughly analyze the impact of light intensity on plant morpho-physiology and phenology.We aim to understand how different light intensities influence key processes in plants growth and development.Furthermore, we seek to assess the consequences of these variations in light intensity on plant morphology and photosynthesis.By gaining a better understanding of how light intensity affects plant morpho-physiology and phenology, we can provide valuable insights to optimize growing conditions and enhance growth, especially for food legumes such as chickpeas and lentils.Overall, our study aims to contribute to advancing knowledge in this field and provide a strong scientific foundation for practical applications aimed at improving crop production and food security.

Plant material, photo-thermal regime and experimental design
Two genotypes of both lentil (Lens culinaris M.) [Bakria and L24] and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) [Farihane and Douyet] were selected from the germplasm of the genetic improvement programs of the National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA Morocco).The selected genotypes were grown under controlled conditions with a photoperiod treatment consisting of 18 h of light at temperatures ranging from 23 to 25 °C and 6 h of darkness at temperatures ranging from 14 to 16 °C in a speed breeding growth chamber where the light source was ' APOLLO 8' broadband lamps (410-730 nm) with an output of 240 W. The control treatment was carried out under green-house conditions with 10-14 h of the daylight between January to June.The experiment involved the implementation of four different light intensities: 2000 µmol/m 2 /s under greenhouse conditions (treatment 1), 148-167 µmol/m 2 /s (treatment 2, speed breeding growth chamber), 111-129 µmol/m 2 /s (treatment 3, speed breeding growth chamber), and 74-93 µmol/m 2 /s (treatment 4, speed breeding growth chamber).To effectively examine the impact of these light intensities, a split plot design was employed with light intensity serving as the main factor and genotype as the sub-plot factor with 3 replications (Fig. 1).
For the four treatments, three seeds of each variety were planted in plastic pots of 5 L capacity filled with 2/3 soil and 1/3 peat compost.The pots were watered every 4-7 days based on the growth stage of the crops and its corresponding water consumption using same quantity of water for all pots.

Plant growth and development monitoring
The studied morphological, physiological and phenological traits and measurements taken during this study were examined in detail (Table 1).

Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics and two-way analysis of variance, with light intensity and variety as factors, were performed to evaluate the impact of different light intensities, varieties and their interaction on the measured variables.Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21 was used for descriptive statistics, while R software was used for variance analysis (ANOVA) through the "agricolae" package [19].Tukey HSD post-hoc tests were used to test the differences between the different light intensity treatments studied using the "multcomp" package [20].In order to better understand how light intensity and variety influence the studied variables, principal component analysis was performed using the R package 'FactoMineR, factoextra' [21].Graphical extrapolation of the cinetics results was performed using Microsoft Excel version 2013.

Morphological, phenological and physiological variation in lentil varieties depending on light intensity
Highly significant variation depending on photoperiod intensity (Treatment) was observed for all studied morphological, phenological and physiological traits except empty pods percentage and wilting severity at vegetative stage (Table 2).The two lentil varieties were similar for all traits except plant height, number of seeds per plant, vegetative stage length, time to flowering, time to pod set and pods' number, which revealed significant differences.The interaction of the two factors was significant for plant height, pods number, number of seeds per plant, growth rate, showing that the influence of light intensity depends on genotype.
The generated boxplots show that, for each measured traits, there are significant variations between the different lentil varieties under different light intensity treatments (Fig. 2).
The influence of light intensity and spectral composition on the flowering time of the two lentil varieties (Bakria and L24) was thoroughly examined in this study.Under treatment 3 (111-129 µmol/m 2 /s) and treatment 4 (74-93 µmol/m 2 /s), variety Bakria showed the shortest flowering time, with flowering occurring 26 days after sowing.In contrast, for variety L24, the flowering time was slightly longer, taking 31 and 28 days after sowing for treatment 3 and treatment 4, respectively.It was noteworthy, to note that compared to treatments under the speed breeding growth chamber, treatment 1 (Green-house: 2000 µmol/m 2 /s) showed the longer flowering time with 67 days after sowing for Bakria variety (Table 3).Mildew fungus attacks on L24 plants under the greenhouse, caused their failure before achieving flowering.Similarly, under treatment 2 (148-167 µmol/ m 2 /s), L24 plants experienced stress due to the high intensity of light, that started with burns on leaves and severe wilting followed by death preventing them from reaching the flowering stage.Additionally, treatment 2 exhibited a shorter time interval of 4 days between flowering and pod set, comparing to 6 days in treatment 4 during the reproductive stage (Table 3).These results suggest that under high light stress conditions, lentil plants tend to accelerate seed production at a faster rate.
For the physiological traits of lentil varieties (Bakria and L24), including growth rate, total biomass, green canopy cover, and plant height, treatment 4 demonstrated the highest values for these traits, while treatment 2 exhibited lower values.When it came to yield-related traits, treatment 4 showed the highest number of seeds per plant and pods number, along with a lower percentage of empty pods (Table 3).Conversely, treatment 2 displayed lower values for these yield-related traits.Additionally, under treatment 2, higher plant stress was observed, as evidenced by elevated wilting scores for both Bakria and L24 varieties.On the other hand, treatment 1 resulted in lower wilting scores, indicating lower stress levels for Measured at vegetative stage using scoring system described by [18] Plant vigor 2 SV2 Measured at flowering stage using scoring system described by [18] Plant vigor 3 SV3 Measured at pod setting stage using scoring system described by [18] Plant vigor 4 SV4 Measured at maturity stage using scoring system described by [18] Time to pod set TPS Measured by counting the days from emergence to appearance of the first pod

Multifactor and multivariable analysis on lentil varieties under different light intensities
A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted to analyze all variables for each light intensity treatment (T1: Green-house: 2000 µmol/m 2 /s; T2: 148-167 µmol/ m2/s; T3: 111-129 µmol/m 2 /s; T4: 74-93 µmol/m 2 /s) in relation to the two lentil varieties (Bakria and L24), considering all studied traits (Fig. 3).The PCA analysis revealed that PCA1 and PCA2 explained 44 and 26% of the total variation, respectively (Fig. 3c).The high cos2 values indicated good representation of variables near the circumference of the correlation circle, while low cos2 values suggested variables were not well represented by the main axes and were positioned closer to the center of the circle (Fig. 3d).Interestingly, the PCA plots demonstrated distinct correlation patterns for the studied traits depending on the light intensity and variety (Fig. 3b).
Treatment 1 showed positive correlations with vegetative stage length, time of pods set, time to flowering, time to maturity, and seed filling stage length, indicating a positive association with phenological stages but a negative association with physiological traits and stress-related traits.Conversely, treatment 2 exhibited positive correlations with wilting scores 1, 2, 3, and 4, indicating a positive association with stress-related traits.On the other hand, treatments 3 and 4 displayed positive correlations with number of secondary stems per plant, green canopy cover, pods number, number of seeds per plant, and growth rate, suggesting a positive relationship with plant growth and physiological variables.In summary, the PCA analysis demonstrated that different light intensities had distinct effects on the correlations between phenological and physiological traits of lentil varieties.Treatments 1, 2, 3, and 4 showed specific associations with different trait categories, highlighting the importance of managing light conditions effectively to optimize both phenological and physiological.

Morphological, phenological and physiological variation in chickpea varieties depending on light intensity
Highly significant variation depending on photoperiod intensity (Treatment) was observed for all studied morphological, phenological and physiological traits except empty pods percentage and seed filling stage length, for which insignificant effect was observed (Table 4).The two chickpea varieties were similar for all traits except empty pods percentage and seed filling stage length, which revealed significant differences.The interaction of the two factors was significant for growth rate and seed filling stage length, showing that the influence of light intensity depends on genotype.
The generated boxplots show that, for each measured traits, there are significant variations between the different chickpea varieties under different light intensity treatments (Fig. 4).
The influence of light intensity and spectral composition on the flowering time of chickpea varieties (Farihane and Douyet) was thoroughly examined in    that under high light stress conditions, chickpea plants tend to accelerate seed production and achieve full maturity more slowly.
For the physiological traits of chickpea varieties (Farihane and Douyet), including growth rate, total biomass, green canopy cover, and plant height, treatment 2 demonstrated the lower values for these traits.When it came to yield-related traits, treatment 4 showed the highest number of seeds per plant and pods number, along with a lower percentage of empty pods (Table 5).Additionally, under treatment 2, higher plant stress was observed, as evidenced by elevated wilting scores for both Farihane and Douyet varieties.On the other hand, treatment 1 resulted in lower wilting scores, indicating lower stress levels for the plants.In conclusion, the results emphasize the substantial influence of light intensity and spectral composition on both phenological and physiological traits of chickpea varieties.This underscores the critical importance of precise light management to enhance flowering and optimize yield outcomes.

Multifactor and multivariable analysis on chickpea varieties under different light intensities
A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted to analyze all variables for each light intensity treatment (T1: Green-house: 2000 µmol/m 2 /s; T2: 148-167 µmol/ m 2 /s; T3: 111-129 µmol/m 2 /s; T4: 74-93 µmol/m 2 /s) in relation to the two chickpea varieties (Farihane and Douyet), considering all studied traits (Fig. 5).The PCA analysis revealed that PCA1 and PCA2 explained 66 and 17% of the total variation, respectively (Fig. 5c).The high cos2 values indicated good representation of variables near the circumference of the correlation circle, while low cos2 values suggested variables were not well represented by the main axes and were positioned closer to the center of the circle (Fig. 5d).Interestingly, the PCA plots demonstrated distinct correlation patterns for the studied traits depending on the light intensity and variety (Fig. 5b).Treatment 1 showed positive correlations with vegetative stage length, time of pods set, time to flowering, time to maturity, seed filling stage length, total biomass and number of secondary stems per plants, indicating a positive association with phenological stages and physiological traits but a negative association with stress-related traits.Conversely, to the treatment 2 and 3, which exhibited positive correlations with wilting scores 1, 2, 3, and 4, indicating a positive association with stressrelated traits.On the other hand, treatments 4 displayed positive correlations with green canopy cover, pods number and number of seeds per plant, suggesting a positive relationship with plant growth and yield-related traits.In summary, the PCA analysis demonstrated that different light intensities had distinct effects on the correlations between phenological and physiological traits of chickpea varieties.Treatments 1, 2, 3, and 4 showed specific associations with different trait categories, highlighting the importance of managing light conditions effectively to optimize both phenological and physiological.

Progression of seedling vigor and wilting score over time and between light intensity treatments
In this study, we investigated the progression of seedling vigor and wilting score over time, as well as the impact of different light intensity treatments on lentil and chickpea plants.Our results revealed significant trends in seedling vigor (Fig. 6a) and wilting score (Fig. 6b) across different development stages, from vegetative (SV1 & WS1) to flowering (SV2 & WS2), pod formation (SV3 & WS3), and maturity (SV4 & WS4) for lentil Bakria variety.Regarding seedling vigor, we observed a consistent decrease as the plants progressed from the vegetative stage to flowering, pod formation, and maturity.This suggests that the early stages of growth are characterized by higher vigor, which gradually declines as the plants reach maturity (Fig. 6).In contrast, the wilting score showed a consistent increase from the vegetative stage to flowering, pod formation, and maturity (Fig. 6).This indicates that the plants experienced increased susceptibility to wilting as they advanced in their growth stages, potentially due to increased light stress during these developmental phases.Furthermore, we examined the effects of varying light intensities on lentil and chickpea plants.
Notably, for lentil plants, we found that an intensity of approximately 8000-9000 lux led to significantly reduced seedling vigor and elevated wilting scores compared to other light intensity treatments (Fig. 7).On the contrary, the other light intensity treatments showed higher seedling vigor and lower wilting scores.Except that, for the chickpea variety Farihane and lentil variety L24, the light intensity treatment of 6000-7000 lux exhibited similar results to the 8000-9000 lux treatment in terms of seedling vigor and wilting score (Fig. 7).

Discussion
Photoperiod duration, light quality and quantity that a plant receives per day are important factors that determine suitable growth and development of plants [22,23].For speed breeding methods using extended photoperiod, the optimization of light parameters such as quality, intensity and photoperiod duration is very important, firstly to ensure a lower plant stress and mortality and secondly to accelerate the plant life cycles [16,17].Results of comparing the effect of different light intensity on lentil and chickpea growth and development was reported and discussed in this paper.Light intensity strongly influenced the expression of the majority of phenological and morpho-physiological traits, including the number of seeds per plant, growth rate, time to flowering, time of pod set, time to maturity, vegetative stage length, reproduction stage length, seed filling stage length, green canopy cover, total biomass, pods number, and plant height.While no significant differences on green canopy cover, the number of secondary stems, the percentage of empty pods and wilting score 1 for lentil, and on seed filling stage length and empty pods percentage for chickpea were observed.Higher light intensity in treatment 2 (148-167 µmol/ m 2 /s) influenced strongly and negatively the green canopy cover, plant height, seedling vigor, pods number, number of seeds per plant and plant height that illustrate (Fig. 8).This is because of the stress induced by the high intensity of light which produces many damage to photosynthesis reactions in the first degree [6], and can perturb the functioning of photosystems, reducing the efficiency of photosynthesis [24].This disruption of photosynthetic reactions, in particular CO2 fixation, has an impact on plant morpho-physiological characteristics, while being positively related to stomatal limitations [25].In contrast, treatment 4 (74-93 µmol/m 2 /s) enhanced clearly growth, phonological and yield-related traits in agreement with the results reported by [14] on Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) finding that lower intensity of light increased plant height and photosynthesis activity.
Various stress factors induce flowering in a large group of plant species.These plants exhibit flowering response as a consequent reaction to a set of distinct stress factors.Nevertheless, it is important to note that not all stressors induce flowering response in all plant species [26].In our study, the flowering time has been significantly affected by treatment intensities comparing to green-house conditions (2000 µmol/ m 2 /s) under natural day/night photoperiod without any light supplement with other treatments intensities under extended photoperiod conditions, for lentil and chickpea.The 2 treatments, 3 (111-129 µmol/m 2 /s) and 4 (74-93 µmol/m 2 /s) with medium level of intensity showed the earliest time to flowering (Tables 3 and 5) compared to treatment 2 that has a much higher intensity of (148-167 µmol/m 2 /s) that caused damage an d stress on plants.Thus medium and low level of light intensity were better to induce an early flowering than higher level of intensity, similar results were observed in Perilla frutescens by [27] reporting that flowering was 100% induced in 4 weeks under low light intensity.In contrast to these results, [28] have tested the effect of the light irradiation on flowering of Summer Pastels, and they found that a high level of intensity of 300 µmol/m 2 /s accelerated the flowering against low level of intensity of 100 µmol/m 2 /s.According to [29], the enhanced growth is attributed to a combination of improved light utilization efficiency under low light conditions and extended daylight duration.In summary, this study has provided significant information on the impact of light intensity on morphological, phonological and physiological traits in lentil and chickpea.Despite the limited availability of comparable studies for specific traits and the studied factors, our results highlight the crucial importance of taking into account the complex interactions between plant traits and light intensity especially for speed breeding purposes.The absence of a solid reference base for certain trait categories further highlights the ongoing need for targeted research to better understanding these aspects.The results generated in this study will serve as a valuable starting point for future research into the underlying mechanisms of plant responses to light intensity, especially for lentil and chickpea.Ultimately, the results presented here make a significant contribution to the optimization of a speed breeding method allowing higher genetic gain thanks to shorter plant growth cycle with limited stress and mortality.In fact, the major implication of limited stress and mortality under the optimized light intensity is that it could help to obtain F 6 populations with higher genetic diversity as result of higher population size, and to achieve rapidly higher homozygosity in segregating populations obtained from crosses.This would contribute to develop training populations for genetic studies (recombinant inbred lines for instance) and feed the breeding pipelines with new lines that were fixed rapidly using limited resources in the perspective of developing new varieties.

Conclusion
This experience provides useful information for optimizing the speed breeding protocol for food legumes such as lentil and chickpea.It is clear that duration of plants light exposure (extended photoperiod) affects significantly, the plants growth and development [16].In this study, the light intensity also has influenced the plant growth and development, and this is clearly showed in the results.The high intensity (148-167 µmol/m 2 /s) was the most stressful and this was shown by dwarf plants, high wilting severity, low seedling vigor, late flowering, high percentage of empty pods, low pod number and low green canopy cover.While modest intensities in treatment 3 (111-129 µmol/m 2 /s) and treatment 4 (74-93 µmol/ m 2 /s) has showed contrasted results.The application of adequate light intensity combined with optimized light duration and light quality, would therefore ensure rapid generation turnover for these crops, with limited loss of genetic variability.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Speed breeding growth chamber design with different light intensities Time to flowering TF Measured by counting the days of plant emergence to the day of the first flower's appearance Time to maturity TM Measured by counting the days from emergence to the yellowing and desiccation of the plant and the pods Total biomass TB Measured weighing all aerial plant parts with a balance after plant harvesting Vegetative stage length VGS Measuring by determining the interval between the day of emergence and the day of appearance of the first flower Wilting severity 1 WS1 Measured at vegetative stage using the scoring scale described by Singh et al., 2013 Wilting severity 2 WS2 Measured at flowering stage using the scoring scale described by Singh et al., 2013 Wilting severity 3 WS3 Measured at pod setting stage using the scoring scale described by Singh et al., 2013 Wilting severity 4 WS4 Measured at maturity stage using the scoring scale described by Singh et al., 2013

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Boxplot of variance and interaction between lentil varieties and light intensity treatments.PH plant height, TB total biomass, NSS number of secondary stem, PN pods number, EPP empty pods percentage, NSP number of seeds per plant, GR growth rate, GCC green canopy cover, TF time to flowering, TPS time of pod set, TM time to maturity, VGS vegetative stage length, RPS reproduction stage length, SFS seed filling stage length

Fig. 3 A
Fig. 3 A-D Multivariable analysis on lentil varieties under light intensity treatments.PH plant height, TB total biomass, NSS number of secondary stem, PN pods number, EPP empty pods percentage, NSP number of seeds per plant, GR growth rate, GCC green canopy cover, SV1 seedling vigor 1, SV2 seedling vigor 2, SV3 seedling vigor 3, SV4 seedling vigor 4, WS1 wilting score 1, wilting score 2, WS3 wilting score 3, WS4 wilting score 4, TF time to flowering, TPS time of pod set, TM time to maturity, VGS vegetative stage length, RPS reproduction stage length, SFS seed filling stage length

Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Boxplot of variance and interaction between chickpea varieties and light intensity treatments.PH plant height, TB total biomass, NSS number of secondary stem, PN pods number, EPP empty pods percentage, NSP number of seeds per plant, GR growth rate, GCC green canopy cover, TF time to flowering, TPS time of pod set, TM time to maturity, VGS vegetative stage length, RPS reproduction stage length, SFS seed filling stage length

Fig. 5 A
Fig. 5 A-D Multivariable analysis on chickpea varieties under light intensity treatments.PH plant height, TB total biomass, NSS number of secondary stem, PN pods number, EPP empty pods percentage, NSP number of seeds per plant, GR growth rate, GCC green canopy cover, SV1 seedling vigor 1, SV2 seedling vigor 2, SV3 seedling vigor 3, SV4 seedling vigor 4, WS1 wilting score 1, wilting score 2, WS3 wilting score 3, WS4 wilting score 4, TF time to flowering, TPS time of pod set, TM time to maturity, VGS vegetative stage length, RPS reproduction stage length, SFS seed filling stage length

Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Seedling vigor and wilting score progression of (a) lentil and (b) chickpea in different light intensities.SV seedling vigor, WS wilting score

Table 1
Morphological, phenological and physiological traits scored on lentil, chickpea varieties under different light intensities

Table 3
Means comparison by Tukey test for the effects of light intensity treatments on measured traits in lentil varietiesLetters (a, b, c, d) denote significant differences among light intensity treatments (pb0.05,Tukey's post hoc test).nd not determined PH plant height, TB total biomass, NSS number of secondary stem, PN pods number, EPP empty pods percentage, NSP number of seeds per plant, GR growth rate, GCC green canopy cover, SV1 seedling vigor 1, SV2 seedling vigor 2, SV3 seedling vigor 3, SV4 seedling vigor 4, WS1 wilting score 1, wilting score 2, WS3 wilting score 3, WS4 wilting score 4, TF time to flowering, TPS time of pod set, TM time to maturity, VGS vegetative stage length, RPS reproduction stage length, SFS seed filling stage length rity times.Additionally, treatment 3 exhibited a shorter time interval of 6 days between flowering and pod set during the reproductive stage, while a longer time interval of 24 days between pod set and maturity for the seed filling stage length (Table5).These results suggest

Table 4
Analysis PH plant height, TB total biomass, NSS number of secondary stem, PN pods number, EPP empty pods percentage, NSP number of seeds per plant, GR growth rate, GCC green canopy cover, SV1 seedling vigor 1, SV2 seedling vigor 2, SV3 seedling vigor 3, SV4 seedling vigor 4, WS1 wilting score 1, wilting score 2, WS3 wilting score 3, WS4 wilting score 4, TF time to flowering, TPS time of pod set, TM time to maturity, VGS vegetative stage length, RPS reproduction stage length, SFS seed filling stage length of variance of 22 morpho-physiological, phenological and growth traits measured for two chickpea varieties (Farihane and Douyet), under four light intensity treatments

Table 5
Means comparison by Tukey test for the effects of light intensity treatments on measured traits in chickpea varietiesLetters (a, b, c, d) denote significant differences among light intensity treatments (pb0.05,Tukey'sposthoc test), nd not determinedPHplant height, TB total biomass, NSS number of secondary stem, PN pods number, EPP empty pods percentage, NSP number of seeds per plant, GR growth rate, GCC green canopy cover, SV1 seedling vigor 1, SV2 seedling vigor 2, SV3 seedling vigor 3, SV4 seedling vigor 4, WS1 wilting score 1, wilting score 2, WS3 wilting score 3, WS4 wilting score 4, TF time to flowering, TPS time of pod set, TM time to maturity, VGS vegetative stage length, RPS reproduction stage length, SFS seed filling stage length